Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 19:5:1064.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01064. eCollection 2014.

Sync or sink? Interpersonal synchrony impacts self-esteem

Affiliations

Sync or sink? Interpersonal synchrony impacts self-esteem

Joanne Lumsden et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Synchronized behavior has significant social influence both in terms of everyday activities (e.g., walking and talking) as well as via more historical contexts (e.g., cultural rituals). Grounded in the science of coordination dynamics, previous research has revealed that interpersonal synchrony has numerous affiliative and pro-social consequences, such as enhanced rapport, cooperation, and social-cognitive functioning. The current study sought to explore the impact of intentional synchrony versus asynchrony on an individual's self-esteem and their feelings of social connection with a partner. The results revealed that individuals felt better about themselves following a period of synchronous compared to asynchronous movement, while they also perceived a greater self-other overlap with their partner. These findings not only extend previous research on social connections following interpersonal synchrony, but also provide the first demonstration of an influence on self-evaluations. Overall, it appears that moving in time with others may result in us feeling better about ourselves compared to moving to our own rhythm.

Keywords: coordination dynamics; interpersonal synchrony; self-esteem; self-other overlap; social connection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Distribution of the relative phase relationship between participant and confederate arm movements as a function of coordination condition (i.e., synchrony or asynchrony).

References

    1. Aron A., Aron E. N., Smollan D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63 96–612 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 - DOI
    1. Baumeister R. F., Leary M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117 497–529 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bowlby J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books
    1. Brown J. D., Marshall M. A. (2001). Self-esteem and emotion: some thoughts and feelings. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27 575–584 10.1177/0146167201275006 - DOI
    1. Cacioppo S., Zhou H., Monteleone G., Majka E. A., Quinn K. A., Ball A. B., et al. (2014). You are in sync with me: neural correlates of interpersonal synchrony with a partner. Neuroscience 277 842–858 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.051 - DOI - PubMed