|
Where there is smoke...
|
Aug. 27th, 2008 @ 11:41 am
|
|---|
|
Ok, you've only had 9 failures this year and you're out of money when it previously took thousands? Seriously people, I don't mean to cause panic, but we are very close to a collapse here. Also, make note in the article of the implications that the FDIC charges a fixed rate of insurance, regardless of bank behavior.
Not only is the federal agency involved in insuring your money not charging enough premiums, but it is not even graduating those premiums on risk behavior!! This is contrary to anything in the private sector.
The sticker at the bank may say its insured by the FDIC, but the reality is if that agency is already broke, your money is at risk. Given that the Federal Reserve at most requires a reserve ratio of 10%, and in the least, 0%, there is very little real money for depositors to withdraw from their accounts should they desire it.
Neither the FDIC, Federal Reserve, nor Federal Government are acting in your best interests with respect to the banking industry. Their policies are directly responsible for the problems we are currently having. Any large bank failure right now could seriously impact the value of the dollar.FDIC may borrow money from Treasury Wednesday August 27, 2:43 am ET
(Reuters) - Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) might have to borrow money from the Treasury Department to see it through an expected wave of bank failures, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The borrowing could be needed to cover short-term cash-flow pressures caused by reimbursing depositors immediately after the failure of a bank, the paper said.
The borrowed money would be repaid once the assets of that failed bank are sold.
"I would not rule out the possibility that at some point we may need to tap into (short-term) lines of credit with the Treasury for working capital, not to cover our losses," Chairman Sheila Bair said in an interview with the paper.
Bair said such a scenario was unlikely in the "near term." With a rise in the number of troubled banks, the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund used to repay insured deposits at failed banks has been drained.
In a bid to replenish the $45.2 billion fund, Bair had said on Tuesday that the FDIC will consider a plan in October to raise the premium rates banks pay into the fund, a move that will further squeeze the industry.
The agency also plans to charge banks that engage in risky lending practices significantly higher premiums than other U.S. banks, Bair said.
The last time the FDIC had borrowed funds from the Treasury was at nearly the tail end of the savings-and-loan crisis in the early 1990s after thousands of banks were shuttered.
The fact that the agency is considering the option again, after the collapse of just nine banks this year, illustrates the concern among Washington regulators about the weakness of the U.S. banking system in the wake of the credit crisis, the Journal said.
(Reporting by Sweta Singh in Bangalore; Editing by Erica Billingham) Current Mood:  nauseated
|
|
What causes inflation?
|
Aug. 11th, 2008 @ 10:30 am
|
|---|
|
Over the past 5 or so days, a couple of my LiveJournal friends have made some posts about the housing market and the sad state that we are in because of the bubble bursting.
There is no mystery about why the foreclosures and bad loans happened. With Freddie Mac announcing a quarterly loss of $821 million, the Congressionally controlled Freddie's chief executive, Richard Syron has stated "we couldn’t afford to say no to anyone."Syron yesterday defended his loan decisions, arguing that Freddie needed to take additional risk to meet its government mandate to provide affordable housing. Although a private company, Freddie Mac was created by Congress to expand mortgage credit and home ownership.
"If you're going to take aid to low-income families seriously, then you're going to make riskier loans," Syron said in an interview yesterday. "We have goals to meet." The quotas for Freddie's mortgages reserved for "underserved areas," have been raised from 21 percent during the Clinton Administration to 39 percent during the Bush Administration.
What causes inefficiencies in the market? What causes inflation? What destroys your standard of living?
Government.
All things being the same, if there were no central banks to control the money supply and your currency was based off of a commodity resource you have stocked, inflation or deflation would be minimal, short, and mostly exist only with respect to actual productivity changes in the workforce.
Bank failures exist because of a term called "fractional reserve banking" in which the Central Bank requires banks to hold only a certain percentage of their deposits.
This is a misrepresentation, or more specifically FRAUD. If the bank says it has your money and you gave it to them, then it needs to have it. The problem is, here in the US, we are down to a 3% reserve ratio.
Think about this! The Federal Reserve has inflated the currency by 33 times just by this action alone! Money from nothing! And if more than 3% of the country asks for their money, we lose everything.- On June 30, 2008, First National Bank of Arizona, merged with First National of Nevada because it was failing.
- On July 23, 2008 Arizona's second-largest credit union, said it lost $42.5 million over the first half of 2008.
- On July 25, 2008, First National of Nevada fails and Mutual of Omaha Bank, Omaha, Nebraska has agreed to assume all deposits.
Wake up and smell the burning rubber people!
Our government wants inflation to be a mystery. It wants bank failures out of the news and swept under the rug as quickly as possible. Blame must be placed on anyone else, especially those evil and bad lenders, regardless that government mandated lenders loosen up their lending practices. And the solution to all of this?
The solution is of course more government regulation!Current Mood:  discontent
|
|
Discrimination
|
Jul. 31st, 2008 @ 02:50 pm
|
|---|
|
I just read a very interesting article on Gun-toting in Georgia: How I learned to stop worrying and love carrying my gun.
I couldn't help remembering that this was exactly how I felt when I first started carrying a weapon, and I still occasionally do when carrying openly.
When I step back and look at everything, its amazing how well we've been socialized to view the gun owner as a pariah, and how the average gun owner feels guilty about exercising a right essential to human liberty. A quote from L. Neil Smith's forthcoming book popped into my head:"Men cannot be governed and remain men. Domesticate the wolf and he changes both physically and mentally. His muzzle shrinks, his teeth diminish, he loses size, speed, and strength, He grows spots. His ears flop. His brain withers. He becomes a dog. Men are on the verge of becoming dogs -- the changes are underway already -- unless we do something to stop it." -- The Ceo Lia Wheeler, Phoebus Krumm L. Neil drew me to his writing because he puts you in a setting that is the opposite of the "gun" culture we have now. That is how I realized what it meant to be discriminated against. When I read The Probability Broach for the first time, I felt like a burden had been lifted from my shoulders. That realization was a life-changing event for me. Firearms are the preservation of life and liberty. To feel guilty and shameful about owning them is such a sad statement on who we have become as a people.
|
|
Capitalism
|
Jul. 21st, 2008 @ 01:33 pm
|
|---|
|
The country of Montenegro has a very nice domain registry code, .ME, and decided to make it available to all. The government of Montenegro struck a very lucrative deal I'm sure, as there are minimum length purchase periods, premium name reserves, and a whole bunch of other stipulations. .ME domains went on sale on Thursday, July 17th. It was one of the most successful domain launches to-date.
I decided to participate in the "land rush" and was actually successful in acquiring a suitable domain, capitalist.me. I'm contemplating using my new domain in place of anarchocap.com. Its much easier for people to understand, remember, and laissez-faire capitalism is after all the currency of liberty.
In that vein, I also finished John Lott's Freedomnomics. Its a very quick read in layman's terms with very current and relevant examples. If you'd like a quick explanation of why capitalism is the economics of freedom without needing a degree in economics to understand, I highly recommend this book. Probably even those who do have an above average or expert grasp in economics will learn something from it. There were a few times in that book where I had "ah-ha" moments! johnlott's blog is also syndicated here so you can add him to your friends list.
Lastly, Lew Rockwell has started to create daily podcasts. Back when I realized I was disenfranchised from the two party political system here in the United States 14 odd years ago, I fell into a group of "libertarians" who really pointed me towards different things to read and learn about this non-mainstream way of thinking. A lot of those "libertarians" were really anarchocapitalists. I couldn't fathom life without government. Lew Rockwell's site and the views on it were ones I initially disagreed with. However, Lew was one of those people directly responsible for my viewpoint change.
Lew is a very eloquent writer and speaker. For those that don't have an education in economics, you can listen to him and he makes sense. Plus he gives references to excellent material where you can learn more. Lew does a great job of addressing the populist and status-quo arguments for government intervention step-by-step and tearing them apart in a very poignant Austrian-school fashion. I think Lew is one of the preeminent figures in anarchocapitalism today because of his style and ability to communicate.Current Mood:  creative
|
|
ACLU v. SCOTUS
|
Jul. 2nd, 2008 @ 10:26 am
|
|---|
|
It seems The ACLU doesn't agree with the recent decision made by the Supreme Court regarding the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. They have come out to publicly say:The ACLU interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right. Therefore, we disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision in D.C. v. Heller. While the decision is a significant and historic reinterpretation of the right to keep and bear arms, the decision leaves many important questions unanswered that will have to be resolved in future litigation, including what regulations are permissible, and which weapons are embraced by the Second Amendment right that the Court has now recognized. The good part is that the responses to this have been 100% negative, and people recognize the hypocrisy of such a position.
Mind you, not one judge of the nine, or to rephrase it for those that have a problem grasping reality, NO ONE on the court, which obviously includes the four dissenting justices, said the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution represents a collective right. I left a comment expressing my views of the ACLU's stance and I've posted it here in its entirety just in case that comment is edited in any capacity."What scares you the most ACLU? That individuals have the right to own weapons to protect their lives from life threatening offenses? Or the fact that your "collective" stance means that whatever your agenda was, you can no longer arbitrarily proceed with it without the justified threat of getting a .45 ACP in the chest?
To deny human beings the individual right to self-defense is the same as condoning slavery. I find the ACLU's position on the Heller decision quite disturbing in the least, especially considering how hard they have worked to undo the "Master" and "Slave" relationships in the 20th Century.
It's quite obvious the ACLU is in fear of losing money from its large benefactors should it support the Heller decision, or even that these very benefactors make policy decisions for the group.
I find the hypocrisy going on here quite grotesque. It seems that according to the ACLU, slavery should still exist in the United States, just under your own terms.
Its refreshing that you've finally shown the public the true face of your organization." Current Mood:  indescribable
|
|
Is GCA '68 "Sporting Purpose" dead?
|
Jun. 30th, 2008 @ 12:13 pm
|
|---|
|
Under the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA '68), all imported firearms must be "generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes" before being approved for importation. Handguns are judged against "factoring criteria," which include overall length, frame construction, weight, caliber and safety features. The factoring criteria have not been reexamined since they were established in 1968.
Well, the Heller ruling just stated that "the District’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense."
It seems that sporting purpose is no longer the standard. While this was a narrow decision, can the language have far broader reaching implications? Here is the hope that the momentum on the Heller decision will be used to challenge the GCA '68 sporting purposes language.Current Mood:  hopeful
|
|
The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
|
Jun. 26th, 2008 @ 09:54 am
|
|---|
|
As I predicted in November, the Supreme Court has ruled that the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is about an individual right to own a gun for traditionally lawful purposes, yet there are restrictions that can be imposed on that right. However banning a whole class of commonly used weapons, and requiring them to be inoperable for their intended lawful use is not acceptable.
I will add that I was pleasantly surprised by the trigger lock ruling. I was up in the air where the court could fall on this, but they found that the Second Amendment is specifically about self-defense, and you can't defend yourself if your gun is required to be locked up."Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment. The District’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense. Under any of the standards of scrutiny the Court has applied to enumerated constitutional rights, this prohibition—in the place where the importance of the lawful defense of self, family, and property is most acute—would fail constitutional muster. Similarly, the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional. Because Heller conceded at oral argument that the D. C. licensing law is permissible if it is not enforced arbitrarily and capriciously, the Court assumes that a license will satisfy his prayer for relief and does not address the licensing requirement. Assuming he is not disqualified from exercising Second Amendment rights, the District must permit Heller to register his handgun and must issue him a license to carry it in the home. Pp. 56–64." The full ruling can be downloaded from the Supreme Court website.
It is my opinion that this is an extremely small win for the gunners. Recognition of an individual right conditioned on federal and state statutes limiting that right will not have much change on the status quo.
I find the wording about firearms in lawful common use a circular argument. If the government can limit fully automatic weapons, then how can they ever enter common use for lawful purposes?Current Mood:  contemplative
|
|
Foreclosure more than doubled in 1Q from 2007
|
May. 1st, 2008 @ 12:59 pm
|
|---|
|
Number of US homes facing foreclosure jumps 112 percent in first quarter from 2007
I don't mean to beat a dead horse, and I've been purposefully not posting about the housing bubble the past few months, but these numbers are just too incredible:- Nationwide, 649,917 homes received at least one foreclosure-related filing in the first three months of the year.
- This is an increase of 23 percent from the fourth quarter of last year.
- One in every 194 households received a foreclosure filing during the quarter.
- Nearly 503,000 homeowners had received mortgage aid in the first quarter.
- Nevada posted the worst foreclosure rate in the nation, with one in every 54 households receiving a foreclosure-related notice.
- Arizona had the third-highest foreclosure rate, with one in every 95 households reporting a foreclosure filing in the quarter. A total of 27,404 homes reported at least one filing, up nearly 245 percent from a year ago and up 45 percent from the last quarter of 2007.
- Nearly 157,000 properties were repossessed by lenders nationwide during the quarter.
What is not being said is that there are so many foreclosed homes on the market, the bank can't even sell them at auctions because they are unwilling to discount the reserve prices. Many auctions go back to the bank.
Couple this with most people already over-extended on credit, and the lack of real available assets or cash to use as down payments and you've got a recipe for "we haven't seen bottom yet."
Also, what's not being talked about beyond the sub-prime loans are those people that got themselves in trouble by taking out Home Equity Lines of Credit to finance their Cadillac Escalades and other "keeping up with the Jones's" toys. When the bubble burst and home values actually decreased, people can no longer sell because they'd owe extraordinary amounts of money on their HELOC. They are now in a negative equity scenario, otherwise known as "upside down" on the house. And with the tightened credit standards, no one is willing to let you refinance for lower rates because you're now a huge risk given how far down the rabbit hole you went.
It ends up being a vicious circle. You're maxing out your credit because you overspent based on a tenuously over-valued house and can't make ends meet every month, but because you did that and so did half the country, you can't refinance to get any relief.
The Federal Reserve really can't do anything about this. Bank loan losses are massive. Huge financial houses are going belly up. No lending company worth their salt is going to take on any additional risk in this environment, certainly not someone with negative equity! And who would blame them?
I think we have at least another year of things getting worse. With oil and food prices going sky high, this is only going to exacerbate the problem.
In addition, people still need a place to live. All those people losing their houses are going to eventually be renting. Watch for rents to start to increase, probably this year.
If you're one of the fortunate top x% of the people out there that actually have the resources to invest in a foreclosed home and can get it for a decent discount, we are now near one of those opportunities in time to buy and become a landlord. Buy low and sell high. Buying low is probably somewhere around the corner.
Hold on to your hats people, its a rough ride and there's not a light in sight.Current Mood:  contemplative
|
|
Commander Picture
|
Apr. 25th, 2008 @ 11:47 am
|
|---|
|
We purchased 'Mander. Here is a picture with him and Catherine. ( Commander Picture. )Current Mood:  chipper
|
|
Commander
|
Apr. 21st, 2008 @ 04:16 pm
|
|---|
|
We were at the barn and one of the boarders there had posted a for sale sign for her horse because of financial difficulties. Her horse is a 19 year old gelding, 1/2 Thoroughbred, 1/2 Quarter horse, 16 hands 2 inches, and very well trained in dressage. He has a great nature, an extremely smooth gait, and a beautiful charcoal dun color.
Unfortunately, the expensive part about horses is their board. We knew we were over paying for Sissy's board when we bought her, but it wasn't that bad. Plus we didn't want to move her away from what she was used to, especially since we didn't know her and she didn't know us. Our barn raised our rates on us after 6 months and we started looking for alternatives.
Well it ends up that we found another barn that is 40%(!) cheaper, and has all the amenities that we were looking for. This, at the same time Commander went up for sale.
As it looks now, we are going to have a new addition to the family. Both Sissy and Commander are going to be moving Saturday.
We also made a deal with the owner, who is happens to be a trainer. She still wants to have access to Commander, which is fine with us. She offered to share some board money every month to do that. We agreed that she would give me some lessons for the time being instead of sharing some of the board money.
I think its a win-win for both. We'll post some pictures of Commander as soon as we have a chance to take some.Current Mood:  chipper
|
| » More LED Light Geekness |
As a follow on to my LED light post a couple of months back, there are now products coming out with the Nichia GS LED (Nichia NSPW500GS). This LED has a larger die than the DS LED in the same 5mm package. The die, however is rectangular and not square, which obviously impacts the light profile. The result is about a 20% improvement in light output over the Nichia DS at the expense of an oval shaped beam profile. The market leader in Chinese LED flashlights, Fenix, has announced their new E01 light based on this LED.
 The specs are:- 10 lumens constant brightness for about 11 hours on a single 1.5v AAA sized battery (Alkaline, Ni-MH, Lithium).
- 7.1cm (Length) x 1.4cm (Diameter)
- HAIII finshed aircraft grade aluminum in Olive (natural), Orange, Blue, Purple, and Black.
- 14-gram weight (excluding batteries)
- Waterproof to IPX-8 Standard
- Capable of standing up securely on a flat surface to serve as a candle
For you non-flashlight geeks out there, if you don't have a key chain light and want one that runs on standard, widely available batteries, this is the one you want. And its available at Fenix-store.com for $15 each shipped worldwide! There is even a coupon (CPF8) that will give you 8% off any orders above $20. That means two of these cost $27.60 shipped.
While 10 lumens isn't exactly what I would consider bright, it is a good amount of light in a dark environment. You will lose your night vision when using this light in the dark. It is probably too bright to read a book in bed without disturbing most people sleeping with you, or to read a menu in a dark restaurant without attracting attention to yourself.
What I'm saying is that this is the perfect light to have on your key chain every day in case of emergency at an extremely reasonable price for what you are getting. It will also serve well as a general task flashlight around the house, albeit it may be a too small in size for some in that role. It would probably handle 90% of your flashlight needs leaving only specialized tasks like tactical defense lighting, or situations were you would need to throw light a long distance to something else.
Apr. 11th, 2008 @ 01:04 pm
|
| » Home, Sweet Home |
Ok, I haven't posted in two months. Once the Super Bowl hit, I was up to my ears in work. Then, we closed on our house March 7th. I've really just spent the past two months working and doing moving related tasks.
We did find a renter for the condo. Even though we are losing money every month, its worth it for us to keep it for a couple of years to see if the market turns around. As it was now, we would have owed the bank money if we would have sold for what the last unit like ours went for.
The flip side of the housing bubble bursting is that our builder offered us an additional $75,000 (!) in incentives. That pretty much made us able to afford to lose money on the condo every month.
I like our new location a whole lot. We are 10 minutes from Sissy now instead of 30. We are about 15 minutes from downtown Cave Creek. Liz is 20 minutes closer to work, but I am about 10 minutes farther. Behind us is a recreational area that, at least for the foreseeable future will remain undeveloped, so we have an unobstructed few of the Cave Buttes mountains out of the back of our house.
This really does feel like home.

Apr. 7th, 2008 @ 12:39 pm
|
| » Finding My Seat |
Well its taken a while, but I'm finally able to figure out how to adjust myself so I keep planted on the horse during her trot. I realized I was keeping my whole body rigid and that was causing me to bounce everywhere. Its the oddest feeling to have to grip with your thighs yet at the same time remain limber with your lower back. I can't even describe it other than to say I've never had to figure out how to do that with my body in my life before. It was a very frustrating few months trying to figure it out, but I'm finally making progress!
Jan. 20th, 2008 @ 10:36 am
|
| » The Case Against The Fed |
I just finished Murray Rothbard's book and can honestly say it knocked my socks off. At 158 pages its not heavy reading, and Rothbard does a great job writing in plain English to help along those who are economics challenged.
What really was interesting to me is the history of how the Fed came into existence. The time-line for this covers a good 50% of the book, and the details are just amazing.
I think Rothbard does best at simply explaining what the Federal Reserve really is, a cartel / monopoly brought about by the Morgan and Rockefeller family owned and allied banks to limit competition and allow for wholesale counterfeiting without recourse. He uses examples and accounting illustrations that are relevant and easy for you and I to comprehend.
There is one thing that is solidified in my mind by this book, and that is without a doubt the Federal Reserve is the sole source of all inflation that is of any consequence in this country. It allows for banks to profit at the expense of the taxpayer with minimum risk. If things go wrong, like now, the Fed just creates more money (inflates) to fix it.
I'll leave this post with a graph of the rise in dollar prices in recent decades. It makes it painfully obvious when United States finally severed the dollar's link to gold.

Jan. 11th, 2008 @ 01:10 pm
|
| » LED Flashlights Update |
Ok, I haven't put on my geek hat for a while when it comes to LED lights, so I might as well now. There is a Moore's Law type of effect going on for LEDs, which is not too much of a stretch considering they are silicon based.
For the first time in hand-held LED flashlight history, I can honestly say that I am giving up my Surefire tactical flashlight. My G2Z with a P61 turbo incandescent lamp is now no match for the Romisen RC-F4 at about 25% of the price. My Surefire ran the P61 lamp for a whole 15 - 20 continuously sickly yellow dimming minutes before it would drain the two 123A type batteries. The Romison RC-F4 does it at constant brightness for over 1.5 hours on the same batteries at the same brightness. Yes, its made in China and it takes 2 weeks to get it from Hong Kong. But for $15, who cares?! Its even using 9 month old LED tech. There are tons of reviews of "budget" flashlights from China in this thread on CandlePowerForums with various levels of power taking a variety of battery types.
5mm LEDs have also been following the improvement curve. Nichia has released its DS LEDs and they are now "2x" brighter than the CS LEDs of past 18 months with the same runtime. My key-chain light is the Photon Freedom with the new DS LED (Nichia NSPW500DS). It puts out about 10 lumens on high. That's good for getting around in the dark, but you can't use the 5mm LEDs for distance at all. At $12 and given its size, you really should think about putting this light on your keychain.
One minus about the Photon Freedom is that it uses coin cell lithium batteries (two 2016 type for the white LED). You can get those on EBay for like 20 cents a piece in quantity, otherwise you get reamed at convenience stores. Ultimately, I'd like to see a AAA light that has an interface like the Photon Freedom. My biggest gripe with AAA lights is that as the LED technology has become brighter and more efficient, light makers are making them brighter instead of longer running. The AAA cell can't handle much. It'd be nice to see an AAA light with a 30 lumen high that lasts for an hour regulated and maybe a 3 lumen low that lasts for 10 hours. When that happens, and it doesn't cost more than $20, I'll give up my Photon Freedom.
Jan. 7th, 2008 @ 02:39 pm
|
|
|
|