The New York Times, cited in posts by Mike Isaac and Andrew Curran, reports that Meta is in early talks to lease computing power to Anthropic in a potential $10 billion deal. If it happens, the arrangement could mark the start of a cloud-computing business for Meta, as the company faces scrutiny over heavy AI infrastructure spending. Andrew Curran’s post also says Anthropic proposed a two-year deal in June and that discussions are ongoing.
Compute moves to those with the highest margin products.
Markets are efficient and rational.
It’s not a very good question to ask an AI company "where will you source compute from?". Financialization of compute markets will take some time but will happen.
It’s a great question to ask: why would someone pay higher margin for your AI?
After Elon signed his compute-as-a-service deal with Anthropic, the question was who would Mark Zuckerberg back? We may have our answer. The NYT says Anthropic proposed the two year deal in June, META is considering it, and they are currently in discussions.
imo can be read a few ways:
meta is "overbuilding" data centers somewhat now for the future, but it doesnt have the demand that Anthropic does, so it leases compute until/IF that demand comes later —SpaceX did the same
(other read is meta giving up, but i highly doubt that)
Today, we launched GPU compute forward curves derived from our prediction market prices. Forward curves are now available on Nvidia B200. H200, and A100 chips.
Forward curves track implied future prices. They are how mature commodity markets form expectations, allocate capital, and manage risk. Energy, interest rates/SOFR, FX, metals, and agricultural markets all rely on market-implied forward prices.
Despite becoming one of the key inputs in the global economy, compute has lacked that market-derived infrastructure. Compute right now is where oil was before NYMEX — traded only via OTC deals, just like oil used to trade OTC between producers and refiners. As compute becomes as fundamental to the economy as energy, the industry will need a similar derivative market to promote efficient price discovery.
Prediction markets are uniquely suited to this problem. Compute is not one uniform commodity and spans many chips, grades, tenors, locations, and contract structures. A live prediction market can aggregate those dispersed views into transparent prices that reflect market expectations for different maturities.
The opportunity is big. Hyperscalers are spending over $700B on compute this year and the market is expected to grow to $7-10T by 2030. If this market behaves like traditional commodity markets, a liquid derivative market could be 10-20x bigger than the underlying spot market.
Compute is still not uniform enough, but this is a step towards standardization as forward curves will help us see the rise and fall of different model prices and how they correlate.
The forward curve is a first step. Up next: futures and perps.
After Elon signed his compute-as-a-service deal with Anthropic, the question was who would Mark Zuckerberg back? We may have our answer. The NYT says Anthropic proposed the two year deal in June, META is considering it, and they are currently in discussions.
Supportive reactions on X mostly saw the reported talks as a smart way for Meta to monetize expensive AI infrastructure and as proof that compute scarcity is reshaping the market.
Negative Read
Critical reactions on X worried the deal could signal softer internal demand at Meta, bad capex optics, or an expensive arrangement for Anthropic.
Based on 7 visible X reactions from 70 accounts; directional sample.
The New York Times, cited in posts by Mike Isaac and Andrew Curran, reports that Meta is in early talks to lease computing power to Anthropic in a potential $10 billion deal. If it happens, the arrangement could mark the start of a cloud-computing business for Meta, as the company faces scrutiny over heavy AI infrastructure spending. Andrew Curran’s post also says Anthropic proposed a two-year deal in June and that discussions are ongoing.
@MikeIsaac@elitanjourno Also, besides the contracts Anthropic and OpenAI signed/negotiating, is there any indication that they are actually short on compute? China has shown their models to be highly inefficient and they hallucinate a lot, yet they don't seem to have many issues with current capacity.
After Elon signed his compute-as-a-service deal with Anthropic, the question was who would Mark Zuckerberg back? We may have our answer. The NYT says Anthropic proposed the two year deal in June, META is considering it, and they are currently in discussions.
Compute moves to those with the highest margin products.
Markets are efficient and rational.
It’s not a very good question to ask an AI company "where will you source compute from?". Financialization of compute markets will take some time but will happen.
It’s a great question to ask: why would someone pay higher margin for your AI?
58
111 saves
92 reposts
Sentiment
Mostly negative
Positive46.7%53.3%Negative
Positive Read
Supportive reactions on X mostly saw the reported talks as a smart way for Meta to monetize expensive AI infrastructure and as proof that compute scarcity is reshaping the market.
Negative Read
Critical reactions on X worried the deal could signal softer internal demand at Meta, bad capex optics, or an expensive arrangement for Anthropic.
Based on 7 visible X reactions from 70 accounts; directional sample.
The labs are splitting into those that do anything to buy compute and those that do anything to sell compute.
I'm surprised there seem to be just two of the former .... it's unsurprising those two are in the lead.
imo can be read a few ways:
meta is "overbuilding" data centers somewhat now for the future, but it doesnt have the demand that Anthropic does, so it leases compute until/IF that demand comes later —SpaceX did the same
(other read is meta giving up, but i highly doubt that)