Jump to content

Talk:Codeine Crazy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 days ago by Zzz plant in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Zzz plant (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Moved to mainspace by TeoTB (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 27 past nominations.

TarnishedPathtalk 13:43, 19 June 2026 (UTC).Reply

  • Regarding ALT1, TM88 made the instrumental for Nicki Minaj and intended to offer it to her, but it doesn't seem like he actually got to offer it. To quote from the source: I really made [the beat for 'Codeine Crazy'] for Nicki. 'Cause she was working on her album, and I was like, I wanted to give her beats so bad, but I ended up not getting them to her. So I think ALT1 needs to be rephrased. The GTA hook is nice; I hadn't considered it as a potential hook while writing the article, but reading it now I like it. I also like the music video hooks. TeoTB (talk) 14:16, 21 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
    I've adjusted Alt1. TarnishedPathtalk 14:26, 21 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Image full review still needed, thanks :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 19:19, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Image In the "Reception and legacy" section, the statement that the song was certified Gold "for sales of 500,000 units" should be changed to "for 500,000 certified units", "for 500,000 units", or just "was certified Gold", because RIAA digital-single certification units actually include both downloads and streaming equivalents, so they are not necessarily sales. The article was moved to mainspace and nominated on June 19, 2026, is comfortably over the minimum prose length, and is neutral and presentable, WP:DYKCRIT is met. I honestly prefer ALT2 for promotion, I don't know why. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:18, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Vanderwaalforces:, I've removed the "for sales of 500,000 units" part. I think any of the alternative wordings you suggested would not read very well, so it's probably best to state that the song was certified gold by the RIAA and leave it at that. TarnishedPathtalk 09:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yea yea, we good to go. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:57, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply